U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1952

Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander

Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided February 20, 1952 · Allen, Hicks, Per Curiam, Simons
194 F.2d 535 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record in the above-entitled causes and the oral arguments had therein, it appears that there are no reversible errors committed at the trial in rulings or instructions to the jury that were prejudicial, or m respect to which appropriate objections were preserved for review; therefore,

The judgment below is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.