U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1952

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hall C. Smith

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hall C. Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided February 12, 1952 · Allen, Martin, McALLISTER, Per Curiam
194 F.2d 536 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Theron L. Caudle, Charles Oliphant, John M. Morawski, Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott and Graham Loving, Jr., all of Washington, D. C., for petitioner., Sol Goodman, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hall C. Smith

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard on the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the Tax Court of the United States, in a prior proceeding, held the respondent liable in equity as a transferee for unpaid taxes of a corporation, and that the decision of the Tax Court, 11 T.C. 174, was affirmed by this court in Charles E. Smith & Sons Co. v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 184 F.2d 1011, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 953, 954, 71 S.Ct. 572, 95 L.Ed. 687.

And it appearing that the receipt of the excessive salary to the extent of which the respondent was held liable as transferee constituted “the bare receipt of property or money wholly belonging to another”, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilcox, 327 U.S. 404, 66 S.Ct. 546, 549, 90 L.Ed. 752, and that the respondent held the funds not for himself but for the creditors of the transferor;

It is ordered that the decision of the Tax Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.