' ■ This cause has been heard on the record and on the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the parties;

And it appearing that, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge in overruling a motion for a new trial, no error inhered in the refusal of the district judSe to direct the jury to return a verdict Bor defendants, there being no substantial evidence that the appellees penpetrated any fraud in connection with their claitns for fire losg and damage; ^ ^ ^ coart properly submitted t0 the jury under clear and correct instructions the issue in the case concerning the amount justly recover-able by appellees from the appellant insuranee companies, and that there was substan *371 tial evidence to support the verdict of the jury upon which the judgment was entered;

And it appearing further that no error is shown in the conduct of the trial by the District Court, its judgment is affirmed; and it is so ordered.