U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1953

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Yeary Transfer Company, Inc.

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Yeary Transfer Company, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided February 20, 1953 · Allen, Martin, McAL-LISTER, Per Curiam
202 F.2d 151; 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 4041 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Leo H. Pou, Washington, D. C., and Gerald E. Jessup, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant., Neil Brooks, U. S. Dept. of Agri., Washington, D. C., amicus curiae., Glenn F. Morgan, Washington, D. C., William Hays, Winchester, Ky., and Robert H. Hays, Lexington, Ky., for appellee., Peter T. Beardsley, Harry E. Boot and Lloyd V. Stover, Washington, D. C., for American Trucking Co., R. B. Gwathmcy, Wilmington, N. C., for Atlantic Coast R. Co., H. L. Walker, Richmond, Va., for C. & O. R. Co., A. J. Dixon, H. J. Karison, Washington, D. C., for Southern R. Co., Walter M. Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, Reuben G. Crimm, Atlanta, Ga., Harry McChes-ney, Jr., Frankfort, Ky., James E. Wilson, Washington, D. C., for L. & N. R. Co.

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Yeary Transfer Company, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, as well as those of amici curia, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment be and. is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the District Court. 104 F.Supp. 245.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.