U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1953

United States v. Michael P. Acri, Dollar Savings & Trust Co., and Edward Oravitz, Administrator of the Estate of John Oravec, A.K.A. Oravitz, Deceased

United States v. Michael P. Acri, Dollar Savings & Trust Co., and Edward Oravitz, Administrator of the Estate of John Oravec, A.K.A. Oravitz, Deceased
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided December 17, 1953 · Allen, Martin, Mc-Allister, Per Curiam
209 F.2d 258 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

H. Brian Holland, Washington, D. C., John J. Kane, Jr., and Frank E. Steel, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant., Francis B. Kavanagh, Cleveland, Ohio, John A. Willo, Youngstown, Ohio, for appellees.

United States v. Michael P. Acri, Dollar Savings & Trust Co., and Edward Oravitz, Administrator of the Estate of John Oravec, A.K.A. Oravitz, Deceased

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed in accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court, 109 F.Supp. 943.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.