Knox v. Great West Life Assur. Co.
Cases that cite this one
22 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Bess (Supreme Court of the United States 1958)
- In re Hendrix (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky 1994)
- United States v. Cornelius W. Sullivan (3d Cir. 1964)
- Nancy Money Turnage (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina 2022)
- Davenport v. United States (District Court, W.D. Kentucky 1991)
- In re May Reporting Services, Inc. (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota 1990)
- In re Ray (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio 1985)
- Mills v. United States (In re Mills) (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee 1984)
- United States v. McGuire (District Court, E.D. Kentucky 1982)
- United States v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 1965)
- United States v. McWilliams (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 1964)
- United States v. Salerno (District Court, D. Nevada 1963)
- United States v. Birns (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1963)
- United States v. Waxman (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1962)
- United States v. Wilson (District Court, D. New Jersey 1961)
- United States v. Budak (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1960)
- United States v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, and the Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, a Corporation (4th Cir. 1958)
- Richard D. Leuschner v. First Western Bank and Trust Company, a California Banking Corporation, and United States of America (1st Cir. 1958)
- United States v. Ott (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1958)
- United States v. Nelle A. Hoper (7th Cir. 1957)
- United States v. Lord (District Court, D. New Hampshire 1957)
- In re the Mills Co. (District Court, S.D. Mississippi 1957)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This case was heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court. The contention that Title 26 U.S.C.A. § 3671 is unconstitutional is without merit. The claim of the United States is based upon its tax lien created and existing under Title 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 3670 and 3671. A federal tax lien may take effect without assessment, notice, or recordation. See Detroit Bank v. United States, 317 U.S. 329, 337, 63 S.Ct. 297, 87 L.Ed. 304. Here, the lien, under the above statutory provisions, arose at the time the assessment list was received by the Collector; and notice and demand for payment were issued to the *785 taxpayer prior to the time that appellant’s claimed interest in the fund in question was acquired; and such a lien is valid and takes priority over claims and liens arising subsequent thereto. Citizens State Bank of Barstow v. Vidal, 10 Cir., 114 F.2d 380. Exemptions provided by state laws are ineffective against the statutory liens of the United States for federal taxes. United States v. Heffron, 9 Cir., 158 F.2d 657. The provisions for judicial review of federal tax assessments satisfy the requirements of due process of law. Phillips v. Commissioner, 283 U.S. 589, 597, 51 S.Ct. 608, 75 L.Ed. 1289.
In accordance with the foregoing, and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Thornton, 109 F.Supp. 207, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.