U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1954

United States v. Ruth B. Hopper

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided April 28, 1954 · Miller, Gourley, Starr

214 F.2d 129; 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2664 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Warren E. Burger, Washington, D. C., John C. Crawford, Jr., Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant., Spears, Reynolds, Moore & Rebman, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Satterwhite v. Bocelato (District Court, E.D. North Carolina 1955)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties ;

And the Court being of the opinion that the judgments of the District Court included in this consolidated appeal are not erroneous, for the reasons given by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion of July 31, 1952, 122 F.Supp. 181, on appellant’s motion for summary judgment;

It Is Ordered That said judgments be and are now affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.