U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1954

National Labor Relations Board v. C. C. Lang & Son, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided April 21, 1954

212 F.2d 436 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

A. Norman Somers, Washington, D. C., for petitioner., McCobb, Heaney & Dunn, Grand Rapids, Mich., for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

National Labor Relations Board v. C. C. Lang & Son, Inc (6th Cir. 1954)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the motion of the National Labor Relations Board for the summary entry of a decree, respondent’s motion for leave to adduce additional evidence, and memorandum of the petitioner in opposition thereto;

And it appearing that there has been no response to the order of the Board charging unfair labor practices and that the request to adduce additional evidence is directed to the point of alleged compliance with the Board’s order;

And it appearing that compliance with the Board’s order does not render the order moot nor constitute a defense to a petition for enforcement, National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc., 339 U.S. 563, 567, 569, 70 S. Ct. 826, 833, 94 L.Ed. 1067;

It is ordered that the motion for leave to adduce additional evidence be and it hereby is denied;

• And it is ordered that the order of the Board be enforced.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.