U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1954

Metalock Repair Service, Inc. v. Harman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided October 20, 1954

216 F.2d 611 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Corbett, Mahoney & Miller, Columbus, Ohio, for appellants., Wayne S. Gerber, John M. Bowsher, Schmieding & Fultz, Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

O'DONNELL v. Watson Bros. Transportation Company (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1960)
Metalock Repair Service, Inc. v. Hal W. Harman, Lois R. Morrison v. Hal W. Harman (6th Cir. 1954)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appeals in these two cases have been heard upon consolidated records, briefs and oral arguments;

And even treating the temporary restraining order entered in each case by the district judge as a temporary injunction in view of his improvident inaction in keeping effective the restraining order in each case for many months without making the restraining order a temporary injunction, it nevertheless follows that, inasmuch as it rested within his discretion to enter an order upon motion directing that the present appellants be made additional parties defendant, such order was not appealable *612because it was not in actuality a final order;

Accordingly, the two causes are remanded to the United States District Court for further procedure.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.