U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1955

Leslie William Reamer v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided December 13, 1955 · Simons, McAllister, Stewart

228 F.2d 906 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Jameson & Sislock, Detroit, Mich., for appellant., Fred W. Kaess, George E. Woods, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Templeton, Unpublished Decision (3-14-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
State v. Hickman, Unpublished Decision (12-13-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Graven (Ohio 1977)
United States v. Ann Marie Maselli (6th Cir. 1976)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is taken from the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. Appellant’s motion was based upon the claim that the evidence upon which he was convicted was inconsistent with the indictment. The indictment charged that appellant, in the course of a bank robbery, “did put in jeopardy the life of Fred W. Pluskat, by the use of a dangerous weapon, * * The evidence showed that it was actually appellant’s co-defendant who held Pluskat at gun point.

Assuming that this claim was of a kind that could properly be made in a motion to vacate sentence, it was without merit. As the district court pointed out, a complete answer to the appellant’s contention is the law that makes a principal of an aider and abettor. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.