U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1956

Kimble Glass Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Kimble Glass Company v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided February 29, 1956 · Martin, Miller, Per Curiam, Stewart
230 F.2d 484; 37 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2697; 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4485 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James M. Guiher, Steptoe & Johnson, Clarksburg, W. Va., C. W. Neuhaus, Fred E. Fuller, Toledo, Ohio, for petitioner., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Louis Schwartz, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Kimble Glass Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case, involving a petition to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board and the Board’s cross-petition for enforcement, was heard on the briefs, record and oral argument of counsel. The Board, upon undisputed evidentiary facts, found that petitioner’s prohibition of the wearing of union badges by its employees was not justified by exceptional circumstances. See Republic Aviation Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 1945, 324 U.S. 793, 65 S.Ct. 982, 89 L.Ed. 1372; Boeing Airplane Co. v. N. L.R.B., 9 Cir., 1954, 217 F.2d 369, especially 374-375. While this court might not have so found, there is, viewing the record as a whole, substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding. Cf. N.L.R. B. v. Hudson Motor Car Co., 6 Cir., 1942, 128 F.2d 528. The Board’s order, in'the usual form, was a reasonable exercise of its powers. See N.L.R.B. v. Mackay Radio & Tel. Co., 1938, 304 U.S. 333, 348, 58 S.Ct. 904, 82 L.Ed. 1381.

It Is Ordered that the Board’s order be and it hereby is enforced.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.