U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1956

Harvey Jack Reynolds v. International-Harvester Company

Harvey Jack Reynolds v. International-Harvester Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided April 30, 1956 · Martin, McALLISTER, Per Curiam, Stewart
233 F.2d 959; 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3226 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

S. Eldridge Sampliner, Cleveland, Ohio, Harvey Goldstein, New York City, for appellant., Johnson, Branard & Jaeger, Cleveland, Ohio, Bradley, Pipin, Vetter & Eaton, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Harvey Jack Reynolds v. International-Harvester Company

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed in accordance with the memorandum opinion, 141 F.Supp. 371 of Judge Jones.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.