Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1956

Don E. Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Company, Inc., and Prater Pulverizer Company, Intervening

Don E. Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Company, Inc., and Prater Pulverizer Company, Intervening
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided October 17, 1956 · Simons, McAllister, Miller
237 F.2d 918 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Frank E. Liveranee, Jr., and Dilley & Dilley, Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellant., John D. McDonald, Grand Rapids, Mich., Sidney Neuman and Fred T. Williams, Chicago, 111., for appellees.

Don E. Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Company, Inc., and Prater Pulverizer Company, Intervening

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the -transcript of the record, the-briefs of the parties, and the argument, of counsel, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged,, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Starr, 134 F.Supp. 572.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.