James L. Huston and Dayton Bait Company v. Buckeye Bait Corporation, Buckeye Molding Company, and William H. Robinson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
James L. Huston and Dayton Bait Company v. Buckeye Bait Corporation, Buckeye Molding Company, and William H. Robinson, 237 F.2d 920 (6th Cir. 1956)
112 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 4
Allen, McALLISTER, Per Curiam, Stewart

James L. Huston and Dayton Bait Company v. Buckeye Bait Corporation, Buckeye Molding Company, and William H. Robinson

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil. 145 F.Supp. 600.

Reference

Full Case Name
James L. HUSTON and Dayton Bait Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BUCKEYE BAIT CORPORATION, Buckeye Molding Company, and William H. Robinson, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Published