James L. Huston and Dayton Bait Company v. Buckeye Bait Corporation, Buckeye Molding Company, and William H. Robinson
James L. Huston and Dayton Bait Company v. Buckeye Bait Corporation, Buckeye Molding Company, and William H. Robinson
237 F.2d 920; 112 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 4
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
James L. Huston and Dayton Bait Company v. Buckeye Bait Corporation, Buckeye Molding Company, and William H. Robinson
Opinion
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel, and the court being duly advised,
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil. 145 F.Supp. 600.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.