Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company
Opinion
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, the court havi mission to counsel for mit its case on the brief being duly advised, ing granted per-appellee to sub-f; and the court
Now, therefore, it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and i£ hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, sustaining appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. 148 F.Supp. 529.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Boyd R. RINGHISER, Appellant, v. the CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published