Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, 241 F.2d 416 (6th Cir. 1956)
Martin, Miller, Judgbi

Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, the court havi mission to counsel for mit its case on the brief being duly advised, ing granted per-appellee to sub-f; and the court

Now, therefore, it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and i£ hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, sustaining appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. 148 F.Supp. 529.

Reference

Full Case Name
Boyd R. RINGHISER, Appellant, v. the CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published