U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1956

Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company

Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided December 19, 1956 · Martin, Miller, Judgbi
241 F.2d 416 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, the court havi mission to counsel for mit its case on the brief being duly advised, ing granted per-appellee to sub-f; and the court

Now, therefore, it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and i£ hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, sustaining appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. 148 F.Supp. 529.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.