U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1958

The Muter Company v. The Magnavox Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided February 12, 1958 · Allen, Martin, McAL-LISTER, Per Curiam

253 F.2d 576; 117 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 6 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Bates, Teare & McBean, Cleveland, Ohio (argued by Albert R. Teare, Cleveland, Ohio), for appellants., Oberlin & Limbach, Cleveland, Ohio, Lockwood, Galt, Woodard & Smith, Indianapolis, Ind. (argued by Arthur A. Smith, Indianapolis, Ind.), for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In re Saether (Court of Customs and Patent Appeals 1974)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court, 160 F.Supp. 169, is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of the District Court and upon the authority of Barber-Coleman Company v. A. G. Redmond Company, 6 Cir., 94 F.2d 717.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.