U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1958

Monday v. Commissioner

Monday v. Commissioner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided February 20, 1958
252 F.2d 789; 1 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1010 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Wm. P. O’Neil, Howard F. Jarvis, Elliott D. Adams, John M. Thornberg, and McAfee Lee, Knoxville, Tenn., for petitioners., Charles K. Rice, Nelson P. Rose, Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson, A. F. Prescott, Fred E. Youngman, John M. Morawski and Carolyn R. Just, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Monday v. Commissioner

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties upon the petitions to review *790the decisions of the Tax Court herein, and it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the findings of the Tax Court and that the findings are not in any respect clearly erroneous (Dough-erty v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1954, 216 F.2d 110);

It is ordered, upon the findings of fact and the well reasoned opinion of the Tax Court, 1957,-T.C.-, that the decisions of the Tax Court are hereby affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.