U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1960

Norman Strunk and Charles (Dick) Eagleton v. Lynn Bomar

Norman Strunk and Charles (Dick) Eagleton v. Lynn Bomar
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided June 14, 1960 · Cecil, McALLISTER, Per Curiam, Simons
281 F.2d 195; 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4277 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Walter A. Kelley, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellants., Henry C. Foutch, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Tennessee, George F. McCanless, Atty. Gen. of Tennessee, on the brief, for ap-pellee.

Norman Strunk and Charles (Dick) Eagleton v. Lynn Bomar

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge William E. Miller.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.