U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1961

Carpenter v. Glock

Carpenter v. Glock
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided January 13, 1961
286 F.2d 431 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

H. M. Shumate and Thomas D. Shumate, Irvine, Ky., Shumate & Shumate, Irvine, Ky., and M. A. Rowady, Winchester, Ky., on brief, for appellants., Troy D. Savage, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, Ky„ J. Marshall McCann, Lexington, Ky., on brief, for appellees.

Carpenter v. Glock

Opinion of the Court

ORDER.

These consolidated cases have been heard and considered upon the extensive *432record and upon the briefs and oral arguments of counsel for the parties; and

It appearing that the decision of the trial judge is clearly set forth by him in his opinion-findings and conclusions; that his findings of fact in each case are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous; and that his conclusions of law are correctly drawn and based upon proper authority;

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment of the United States District Court in each case be affirmed upon the comprehensive findings, conclusions and opinion of Judge Ford. 184 F.Supp. 829.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.