U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1969

National Cash Register Company v. National Labor Relations Board

National Cash Register Company v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided January 8, 1969 · Weick, O'Sullivan, Phillips
405 F.2d 497; 70 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2240; 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9422 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio <William K. Engeman, Cincinnati, Ohio, ■on the brief), for petitioner. William C. Brafford, Dayton, Ohio, of counsel., Elliott Moore, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Laurence Silberman, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

National Cash Register Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The case is before the Court upon the petition of National Cash Register Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board has filed a cross petition for enforcement. The decision and order of the Board are reported at 167 N.L.R.B. No. 158.

Upon consideration, the Court finds that the decision and order of the Board are not supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456.

It is ordered that the petition to review and set aside the order of the Board be and hereby is granted and that enforcement of the order be and hereby is denied.

Entered by order of the Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.