U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1969

United States v. Estate of Thomas S. Donnelly, Sr., Oscar A. Carlson and Genevieve S. Carlson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided January 10, 1969 · Celebrezze, Combs, McALLISTER

406 F.2d 1065; 23 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 69 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Chester C. Davenport, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, John J. Gobel, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief; Lawrence Gubow, Detroit, Mich, (resigned) Now U. S. Atty. Robert J. Grace, Joseph F. Deeb, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., of counsel, for appellant., Daniel N. Pevos, Detroit, Mich., Pevos & Pevos, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision. The 8 that cite it most often are listed here.

In the Matter of Autorama Tool & Die Company, Bankrupt. Henry Faulk v. United States (6th Cir. 1969)
Grinslade v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1973)
Fausner v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1971)
Sutton v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1971)
United States v. Estate of Donnelly (Supreme Court of the United States 1970)
Cross v. Elected Officials Retirement Plan (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014)
Justice v. Carter (8th Cir. 1992)
Braver v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1973)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the briefs and record, and the arguments of the parties in open court, and the Court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kaess, 295 F.Supp. 557.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.