U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1969

National Labor Relations Board v. General Automation Mfg., Inc.

National Labor Relations Board v. General Automation Mfg., Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided April 18, 1969
408 F.2d 380; 71 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2047; 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12751 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Ronald Wm. Egnor, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., on brief, for petitioner., Edward J. Simerka, Cleveland, Ohio, V. Jay Einhart, Carl H. Clark, Stanley, Smoyer & Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, George B. Wells, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondent., Jordan Rossen, Detroit, Mich., Stephen I. Sehlossberg, John A. Fillion, Bernard F. Ashe, Stanley Lubin, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for intervenor.

National Labor Relations Board v. General Automation Mfg., Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER.

This cause came on to be heard upon the record on appeal and the briefs and arguments of counsel, and upon due consideration thereof and of the factual situation as set out in the record and the report of the case, 167 N.L.R.B. No. 66, it appears to the Court that the findings and order of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the order of the Board be, and it is, hereby enforced.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.