U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1969

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters' Freight Local No. 480

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided April 23, 1969 · Celebrezze, Phillips, Weick

409 F.2d 610 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Leonard M. Wagman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Herbert Fishgold, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., on brief., Cecil D. Branstetter, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent; Carrol D. Kilgore, Nashville, Tenn., on brief., Mullinax, Wells, Mauzy, Levy & Richards, by L. N. D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., on brief of amicus curiae Southern Conference of Teamsters.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters' Freight Local No. 480 (6th Cir. 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned for enforcement of its order finding the Respondent, Teamsters’ Freight Local No. 480 guilty of violations of Sections 8(b) (1) (A) and 8(b) (2) of the National Labor Relations Act. *611The Board’s decision and order are reported at 167 N.L.R.B. No. 135.

The cause having come on to be heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and upon due consideration thereof, the Court is of the opinion that there is substantial evidence upon the record, viewed as a whole, to support the findings of the Board.

Now therefore, it is ordered that the petition for enforcement of the said order of the Board may be, and it is hereby granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.