U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1970

Joseph E. Sleeman v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company

Joseph E. Sleeman v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided May 5, 1970 · Phillips, Edwards, Peck
424 F.2d 547; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9412 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

W. Fred Hunting, Jr., Grand Rapids, Mich., Paul 0. Strawhecker, Grand Rapids, Mich., Robert 0. Straub, Southfield, Mich., on the brief, for appellant., F. William McKee, Grand Rapids, Mich., Rhoads, McKee & Boer, Daniel Murray, Grand Rapids, Mich., on the brief, for appellee.

Joseph E. Sleeman v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the briefs, records and oral argument in this appeal, the judgment of the District Court, 305 F. Supp. 33, is vacated and reversed.

The court notes that a stipulation has been entered between the parties showing that $87,408.69 had been paid to plaintiff by defendant, and the court further notes that said sum properly reflects reduction of the judgment to present worth, in accordance with the record in the original trial and in accordance with the opinion of this court in Sleeman v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway, 414 F.2d 305 (6th Cir. 1969).

Therefore, on filing of said stipulation in the District Court, it is ordered that satisfaction of judgment be entered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.