U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1970

United States v. Walter R. Grooms

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided July 2, 1970 · McCree, Brooks, O'Sullivan

438 F.2d 967; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8352 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Dale Quillen, Nashville, Tenn., on brief, for defendant-appellant., W. Thomas Dillard, Asst. U. S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellee; John L. Bowers, Jr., U. S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., on brief.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Stinson (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1982)
United States v. Grindstaff (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1978)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

Following a jury trial the defendant-appellant appeals his conviction for con *968 spiring to violate and violating the Internal Revenue Laws. D.C., 320 F.Supp. 498. (Title 18 U.S.C. § 371 and Title 26 U.S.C. § 5604 [a] [1]). He complains (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction; (2) of the denial of permission to examine the court reporter’s notes of another case; (3) of failure to grant him severance; and (4) of the unconstitutionality of the Internal Revenue Laws. We have considered all of these issues and conclude they are without merit and that defendant was afforded a fair trial free of any prejudicial error. Certiorari Denied, 400 U.S. 929, 91 S.Ct. 189, 27 L.Ed.2d 190.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.