U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1980

National Labor Relations Board v. Topinka's Country House, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board v. Topinka's Country House, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided July 1, 1980 · Engel, Merritt, Martin
624 F.2d 770; 105 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3419; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16077 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Elliott Moore, William Wachter, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Corinna Metcalf, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Bernard Gott-fried, Director, Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., for petitioner., Bernard J. Fieger, Fieger, Golden & Cousens, Southfield, Mich., for respondent.

National Labor Relations Board v. Topinka's Country House, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision. The 4 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

The National Labor Relations Board has applied to this court for enforcement of its order issued on March 13, 1978, against respondent Topinka’s Country House, Inc., (reported at 235 NLRB No. 18). The Board found that Topinka’s violated sections 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to adhere to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement to which it was a party. Topinka’s contends that the sale of all of the corporation stock, accompanied by the transfer of the corporation’s Michigan liquor license, makes the corporation a new employer which is not bound by the collective bargaining agreement executed before the stock transfer. Upon due consideration, we conclude that *771 the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Board’s application for enforcement of its order be and it is hereby granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.