U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1980

The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. The National Labor Relations Board

The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. The National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided October 6, 1980 · Engel, Merritt, Guy
651 F.2d 1172; 108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2428; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13378 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

J. Mack Swigert, Taft, Stettinius & Hol-lister, Cincinnati, Ohio, Martin Wald, Nicholas N. Price, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner., Elliott Moore, Kenneth Hipp, Frederick Havard, Deputy Associate General Counsel N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for respondent., Peter W. Hirsch, Director, Region 4, N.L. R.B., Philadelphia, Pa.

The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. The National Labor Relations Board

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

651 F.2d 1172

108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2428

The FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
The NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

78-1466.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 6, 1980.

J. Mack Swigert, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, Martin Wald, Nicholas N. Price, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

Elliott Moore, Kenneth Hipp, Frederick Havard, Deputy Associate General Counsel N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

1

Peter W. Hirsch, Director, Region 4, N.L.R.B., Philadelphia, Pa.

2

Before ENGEL and MERRITT, Circuit Judges and GUY, District Judge.*

ORDER

3

This matter is before the court on cross-petitions for review and enforcement respectively of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board issued September 29, 1978, and reported at 238 NLRB No. 168.

4

Upon consideration,

5

IT IS ORDERED that the order of the National Labor Relations Board is enforced.

6

ENGEL, Judge, dissents.

7

He would hold, as did the Administrative Law Judge, that petitioner's conduct did not violate the Act, Hoover v. NLRB, 191 F.2d 380 (6th Cir. 1951); NLRB v. Local 1229 I.B.E.W. (Jefferson Standard), 346 U.S. 464, 74 S.Ct. 172, 98 L.Ed. 195 (1953).

*

Hon. Ralph B. Guy, Jr., Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.