U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1983

United States v. Piccolo

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided April 7, 1983

705 F.2d 800; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29020 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Carl Ziemba, Detroit, Mich., for defendant-appellant., Richard A. Rossman, U.S. Atty., Ross Parker, Maura Corrigan, Asst. U.S. Attys., Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Luis Anthony Rivera (10th Cir. 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the ease on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment, 696 F.2d 1162, of this Court is vacated, issuance of the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. The Clerk will direct the parties concerning the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.