Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1984

Blankenship v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Blankenship v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided September 18, 1984
750 F.2d 30 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Ronald E. Meredith, U.S. Atty., Michael F. Spalding, Asst. U.S. Atty., Louisville, Ky., Verrell L. Dethloff, Jr., Baltimore, Md., William Kanter, John F. Cordes, Michael Kimmel, Appellate Staff, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant., Barry L. Master, Brian P. Lawlor, Legal Aid Soc. of Louisville, Louisville, Ky., Henry Freedman, Alan H. Kleinman, Center on Social Welfare Policy, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Blankenship v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Upon consideration it is ORDERED that the decision in these cases, reported at 722 F.2d 1282 (6th Cir. 1983), be vacated and these cases be and they hereby are remanded to the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky for reconsideration in light of Heckler v. Day, — U.S.—, 104 S.Ct. 2249, 81 L.Ed.2d 88 (1984). Plaintiffs-Appellees’ Motion to Clarify is hereby denied.

ON CONSENT MOTION

Upon consideration of the Consent Motion To Clarify And Amend Remand Order filed in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that the consent motion is GRANTED, and this Court’s remand order of September 18, 1984, is amended to provide: “The district court’s judgment and injunction are vacated pending reconsideration by the district court under Heckler v. Day.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.