U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1985

Richard Mehrman, Sr. v. Thomas M. Ciesliga and Kathleen M. Ciesliga

Richard Mehrman, Sr. v. Thomas M. Ciesliga and Kathleen M. Ciesliga
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided March 14, 1985
762 F.2d 1009; 1985 WL 13052 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Richard Mehrman, Sr. v. Thomas M. Ciesliga and Kathleen M. Ciesliga

Opinion

762 F.2d 1009

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
RICHARD MEHRMAN, SR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
THOMAS M. CIESLIGA AND KATHLEEN M. CIESLIGA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

NO. 84-1575

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

3/14/85

ORDER

BEFORE: MERRITT, CONTIE, and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

1

This cause comes before the court upon the joint motion of the parties for on order remanding the cause to the district court, for subsequent remand to the bankruptcy court for entry of a consent judgment.

2

Upon consideration of the motion, and noting the certification of the bankruptcy judge that were the matter remanded he would be inclined to grant the parties' joint motion for relief pursuant to F.R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6), First National Bank of Salem v. Hirsch, 535 F. 2d 343 (6th Cir. 1976); it is

3

ORDERED that the motion be, and it hereby is, granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.