U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1985

Mid-South Agri Chemical Corp., and Middle Tennessee Grain Company, Inc. v. William Earl Judkins

Mid-South Agri Chemical Corp., and Middle Tennessee Grain Company, Inc. v. William Earl Judkins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided June 14, 1985
767 F.2d 921; 1985 WL 13454 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Mid-South Agri Chemical Corp., and Middle Tennessee Grain Company, Inc. v. William Earl Judkins

Opinion

767 F.2d 921

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
MID-SOUTH AGRI CHEMICAL CORP., AND MIDDLE TENNESSEE GRAIN
COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
WILLIAM EARL JUDKINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

NO. 84-6010

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

6/14/85

REMANDED

M.D.Tenn.

BEFORE: KENNEDY, CONTIE, AND MILBURN, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

1

In accordance with the agreement reached between the parties in settlement discussions conducted pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 18, the parties jointly move to remand this cause to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee for determination of the parties' joint motion filed pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2

Upon consideration of the motion and further considering Judge Lundin's order of April 24, 1985,

3

It is ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is granted. The appeal is remanded to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for further proceedings. See First National Bank of Salem, Ohio v. Hirsch, 535 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1976).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.