U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1985

United States v. City of Parma, Ohio

United States v. City of Parma, Ohio
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided September 26, 1985
774 F.2d 1164; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14042; 1985 WL 13765 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. City of Parma, Ohio

Opinion

774 F.2d 1164

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
City of Parma, Ohio, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 85-3657

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

9/26/85

N.D.Ohio, 504 F. Supp. 913

APPEAL DISMISSED

ORDER

BEFORE: KEITH, KENNEDY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

1

This matter is before the Court on the motion of the City of Parma, Ohio, for a stay pending appeal of the district court's orders of July 30, 1985 and August 7, 1985. In the alternative, appellant seeks to have the notice of appeal construed as a petition for a writ of mandamus. This Court granted a temporary stay until a full panel could consider the motion.

2

The Court concludes that the orders from which appellant prosecuted this appeal are nonappealable orders. The Court further concludes that appellant has failed to show any extraordinary circumstances which would compel this Court to use mandamus to review these nonappealable interlocutory orders. Hammons v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Etc., Loc. No. 20, 754 F.2d 177, 179 (6th Cir. 1985). Therefore, it is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed as being prosecuted from nonappealable orders.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.