U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1986

Haag v. Cuyahoga County

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided July 29, 1986

798 F.2d 1414; 1986 WL 17279 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

798 F.2d 1414

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Haag
v.
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, et al., Defendants-Appellees

No. 85-3633.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

July 29, 1986.

Before MILBURN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and DeMASCIO, District Judge.*

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The Court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the District Court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

The Honorable Robert E. DeMascio, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.