U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1987

Gaunce v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co.

Gaunce v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided January 27, 1987
812 F.2d 1406; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1375; 1987 WL 36556 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Gaunce v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co.

Opinion

812 F.2d 1406

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Martha B. GAUNCE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE CO., Insurance Commissioner-State
of Michigan, Earle Lee; J.D. Bruff, Jack Neal,
Thomas E. Lengauer, Luke McMurray,
Stephen Zahs, David Stewart,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85-1577.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 27, 1987.

Before KEITH, KRUPANSKY and GUY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Appellant appeals from the district court order which dismissed her 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981, 1983 and 1985(2) complaint. The case has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and the record, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

It is ORDERED that the district court's judgment be affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. Rule 9(d)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.