U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1987

Rocky Lee Coker v. Lamar Alexander, Stephen Norris, Michael Dutton, and Michael Kendrick

Rocky Lee Coker v. Lamar Alexander, Stephen Norris, Michael Dutton, and Michael Kendrick
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided September 28, 1987
829 F.2d 1125; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12830; 1987 WL 44895 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Rocky Lee Coker v. Lamar Alexander, Stephen Norris, Michael Dutton, and Michael Kendrick

Opinion

829 F.2d 1125

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Rocky Lee COKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lamar ALEXANDER, Stephen Norris, Michael Dutton, and Michael
Kendrick, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-5294

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

September 28, 1987.

ORDER

Before ENGEL, MERRITT and RYAN, Circuit Judges.

1

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

Upon consideration, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion and order dated January 27, 1987. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.