U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1988

Eugene Clay v. Gary Livesay, Warden

Eugene Clay v. Gary Livesay, Warden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided January 22, 1988
837 F.2d 1091; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 606; 1988 WL 4415 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Eugene Clay v. Gary Livesay, Warden

Opinion

837 F.2d 1091

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Eugene CLAY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gary LIVESAY, Warden, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 86-6302.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 22, 1988.

Before MERRITT and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it hereby is affirmed upon the opinion of the district court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.