Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1988

United States v. Robert Richard Schultz

United States v. Robert Richard Schultz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided February 24, 1988
840 F.2d 18; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2276; 1988 WL 13527 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Robert Richard Schultz

Opinion

840 F.2d 18

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert Richard SCHULTZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-3280.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 24, 1988.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, NATHANIEL R. JONES and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The Court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and that the district court lacked jurisdiction pursuant to United States of America, v. Sarduy (6th Cir. No. 87-5540, January 29, 1988); it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑