U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1988

Andre Floyd v. Arthur Tate

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided March 1, 1988

841 F.2d 1126; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2613; 1988 WL 16209 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

841 F.2d 1126

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Andre FLOYD, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Arthur TATE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 87-3358.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 1, 1988.

Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Andre Floyd, has appealed from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon consideration of the entire record and the briefs filed by the respective parties, this court AFFIRMS the decision of the district court for the reasons stated by Judge Bell in his order of February 27, 1987.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.