William Groseclose, Cross-Appellants v. Michael Dutton, Warden, Cross-Appellees
William Groseclose, Cross-Appellants v. Michael Dutton, Warden, Cross-Appellees
Opinion
848 F.2d 190
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
William GROSECLOSE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,
v.
Michael DUTTON, Warden, et al., Defendants-Appellants,
Cross-Appellees.
Nos. 87-6091, 87-6092.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 11, 1988.
Before MERRITT and CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
In accordance with the agreement reached between the parties in settlement discussions conducted pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 18, the parties jointly move to remand this cause to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee for determination of the parties' motion filed pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Upon consideration of the motion and further considering Judge Higgins order of March 10, 1988,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is granted. The matter is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings. See First National Bank of Salem, Ohio v. Hirsch, 535 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1976).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.