U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1988

Theresa Leezy v. Adm Milling Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided June 10, 1988

849 F.2d 609; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8024; 1988 WL 58886 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

849 F.2d 609

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Theresa LEEZY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ADM MILLING COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees

No. 87-5847.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 10, 1988.

Before CORNELIA G. KENNEDY and NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The Court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.