U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1988

William L. Deering v. Edward Meese Norman Carlson U.S. Parole Commission William R. Story Paul Helo Ray Essex Beverly Sharp

William L. Deering v. Edward Meese Norman Carlson U.S. Parole Commission William R. Story Paul Helo Ray Essex Beverly Sharp
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided August 1, 1988
852 F.2d 1287; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10162; 1988 WL 79433 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

William L. Deering v. Edward Meese Norman Carlson U.S. Parole Commission William R. Story Paul Helo Ray Essex Beverly Sharp

Opinion

852 F.2d 1287

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
William L. DEERING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward MEESE; Norman Carlson; U.S. Parole Commission;
William R. Story; Paul Helo; Ray Essex; Beverly
Sharp, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-5010.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 1, 1988.

1

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and WELLFORD Circuit Judges, and JAMES H. JARVIS, District Judge.*

ORDER

2

This appeal has been referred to this panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

3

A review of the record reflects that appellant has appealed from a December 22, 1987 protective order with regard to interrogatories. A protective order is a discovery order that is nonappealable. Dow Chemical Co. v. Taylor, 519 F.2d 352 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1033 (1975). Therefore, this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

*

The Honorable James H. Jarvis, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.