Michael E. Shockey v. Arthur Tate, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit August 9, 1988

Michael E. Shockey v. Arthur Tate, Jr., 853 F.2d 927 (6th Cir. 1988)

1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10920; 1988 WL 82353

Opinion

853 F.2d 927

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Michael E. SHOCKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Arthur TATE, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-3185.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 9, 1988.

Before LIVELY, MERRITT and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The Court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status: Unpublished