U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1988

48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,509, 3 indiv.empl.rts.cas. 1706 Roland M. Lovvorn v. The City of Chattanooga, Tennessee

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided August 3, 1988 · Engel, Lively, Keith, Merritt, Kennedy, Martin, Jones, Krupansky, Wellford, Milburn, Guy, Nelson, Ryan, Boggs, Norris

861 F.2d 1388; 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1706; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 19021; 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,509; 1988 WL 130659 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Holliday v. City of Modesto (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)
Ensor v. Rust Engineering Co. (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1989)
City of Annapolis v. United Food Workers, Local 400 (Md. 1989)
NAT. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS v. Burnley (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1988)
National Air Traffic Controllers Ass'n v. Burnley (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.