Tommie Jerningham, Jr. v. Carl Humphreys, Supt.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Tommie Jerningham, Jr. v. Carl Humphreys, Supt., 868 F.2d 846 (6th Cir. 1989)
1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2078; 1989 WL 16293

Tommie Jerningham, Jr. v. Carl Humphreys, Supt.

Opinion

ORDER

This court entered an order on January 3, 1989, directing the appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because of a late notice of appeal. Appellant has failed to respond to that order.

*847 It appears from the record that the final order was entered October 3, 1988. The notice of appeal filed on November 14, 1988, was 12 days late. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a) and 26(a).

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Fed.R.App.P. 4(a) is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this court can neither waive nor extend. McMillan v. Barksdale, 823 F.2d 981, 982 (6th Cir. 1987); Myers v. Ace Hardware, Inc., 777 F.2d 1099, 1102 (6th Cir. 1985); Denley v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 733 F.2d 39, 41 (6th Cir. 1984) (per curiam); Peake v. First Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016, 1018 (6th Cir. 1983). Fed.R.App.P. 26(b) specifically provides that this court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Reference

Full Case Name
Tommie JERNINGHAM, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl HUMPHREYS, Supt., Respondent-Appellee
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published