Samuel John Major Davis, Jr. v. United States Parole Commission
Cases that cite this one
42 later published cases cite this decision. The 21 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Jones v. Williams (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2022)
- Woods v. Williams (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2021)
- Evans v. Williams (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2020)
- AISEN v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2025)
- Jessie v. Michigan Attorney General (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2024)
- Jacobs v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2024)
- Williams v. People of the State of Michigan (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2024)
- Houston v. People of the State of Michigan (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2023)
- Gamet v. Howard (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2023)
- Karnak v. Fleming (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2023)
- Williams v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2023)
- Young v. Nagy (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2022)
- Hudson v. Horton (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2022)
- Williams v. People of the State of Michigan ALL ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE ON 10-CV-11939 (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2022)
- Williams v. Rapelje (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2022)
- Simmons v. Michigan, State of (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2022)
- Zeigler v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2022)
- King v. State Of Ohio (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2022)
- Peats v. Miniard (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2021)
- Cook v. Hemingway (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2021)
- Gray v. Cheeks (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2021)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
870 F.2d 657
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Samuel John Major DAVIS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 88-5905.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 7, 1989.
Before BOYCE F. MARTIN Jr. and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. POTTER, District Judge.*
ORDER
This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).
Samuel John Major Davis, Jr., appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241. Davis alleged that the defendant Parole Commission improperly set his presumptive parole date outside the parole guidelines. The district court dismissed the petition as duplicative of a pending habeas petition in which petitioner also alleged that the Parole Commission improperly set his presumptive parole date.
Upon consideration, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed the petition. Petitioner does not dispute the district court's finding that the instant petition is "essentially the same" as the earlier petition. Further, the district court noted that petitioner may seek to amend his other petition in order to assert any new grounds for relief. Under these undisputed circumstances, we conclude that dismissal was proper.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
The Honorable John W. Potter, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.