U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1989

Charles K. Rogers v. Cathy E. Rogers, Randall A. York

Charles K. Rogers v. Cathy E. Rogers, Randall A. York
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided March 29, 1989
872 F.2d 1028; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3998; 1989 WL 34042 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Charles K. Rogers v. Cathy E. Rogers, Randall A. York

Opinion

872 F.2d 1028

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Charles K. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Cathy E. ROGERS, Randall A. York, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-5443.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 29, 1989.

1

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, JOHN D. HOLSCHUH, District Judge.*

ORDER

2

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

3

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

*

The Honorable John D. Holschuh, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.