U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1989

United States v. James G. Carey and Thomas James Savoca

United States v. James G. Carey and Thomas James Savoca
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided April 3, 1989
872 F.2d 1029; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4409 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. James G. Carey and Thomas James Savoca

Opinion

872 F.2d 1029

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James G. CAREY and Thomas James Savoca, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 88-5606, 88-5612.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 3, 1989.

Before KRUPANSKY and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges; and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Defendants-appellants, James C. Carey (Carey) and Thomas James Savoca (Savoca), have appealed from the entry of a judgment of conviction entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, pursuant to the verdict of the jury, in which both defendants were found guilty on all counts of a six-count indictment. Upon review of the appellants assignments of error, the record in its entirety, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel, this court concludes that no reversible error was committed during the course of the criminal trial.

2

Accordingly, the judgement of conviction entered by the district court pursuant to the jury's verdict is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.