U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1989

United States v. Mary Ray

United States v. Mary Ray
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided September 21, 1989
884 F.2d 1393 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Mary Ray

Opinion

884 F.2d 1393

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Mary RAY, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 88-5934, 88-5948.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 21, 1989.

1

Before MERRITT and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and CHARLES R. SIMPSON, District Judge.*

2

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

3

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

*

The Honorable Charles R. Simpson, District Judge for the Western District of Kentucky sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.